Beyond Gran Torino and Asian Males in Media

So...Bee Vang.

If you don't know him, then it's probably good to know who he is.

If you can know who Clint Eastwood is, you should definitely take time to know Bee Vang. Bee Vang was Clint Eastwood's co-star in Gran Torino.

I wrote a kind of synopsis of Bee and his experience making the film on my "ideas" AMMMO blog. Clint Eastwood included.

Bee Vang's a cool kid. It was at once surprising and refreshing to hear him spit hot fire on topics of race, masculinity, and media activism, ultimately deconstructing a movie that he played the lead role in.

Gran Torino was just one in a line of big Hollywood movies that have either ignored, impersonalized, de-masculinized, taken away the agency of the Asian male. Avatar: The Last Airbender directed by M.Night Shyalaman was based heavily on Chinese culture. However, the lead characters were three white actors, leaving Asian faces to provide the background. The movie so blatantly erased Asian culture and identity that it sparked the website

21 the movie was based on the life of mostly Asian MIT students who learned how to beat the Vegas tables using an intricate card counting system. The main guy was based on Jeff Ma, a kid who grew up in Massachusetts. His was centered around his circle of friends who were mostly Asian. However, in the production of the movie, the lead roles, went to London-based actor Jim Sturgess, a white guy and Kate Bosworth, a woman whiter than a New England winter.

So the question brought up by those two movies: Why would they cast white people in stories?

Simple! Because Asian characters wouldn't generate revenue, say studio executives. And that's the bottomline!

Unfortunately, the bottomline more often than not leads to less-than-ideal results, particularly if you're interested in representations of reality. It seems like a story's reality is represented to the extent that it doesn't interfere with making money, especially in Hollywood. The priority seems to be based on doing anything that gets people excited enough to fork over 10 bucks to earn the privilege of staring at 50 foot screen for 2 hours.

And unfortunately, movies can influence thinking and stereotypes about groups of people.

However, it is an accepted common practice to deny that you would let a movie influence your thinking.

The Asian Male in the Media and the Implications of it

The workshop held be Bee and Professor Schein, organized by Prof Scott Wilson, for me was pretty much the affirmation of a lifelong narrative of feeling invisible and insignificant. I mean, I don't suddenly need all this importance placed upon me, but it's nice to be acknowledged instead of categorically dismissed.

I wrote about how the only time I remember seeing a Filipino acknowledged in American media as a 9-year old was in an FBI warrant list. It was fascinating and scary at the same time, having someone who looked like he could be my uncle. I always wondered how mean the FBI dude actually was. I wrote about how the tide seems to be changing today and why Manny Pacquiao, the boxer is very important to a lot of us.

Now why is it important that Asian males have more representation in the media?

Well, I just kinda wish people would get used to the idea that we are subjects too, with emotions, opinions, ideas. My entire persona can't be dismissed just because I fit maybe a few characteristics of stereotypes.

I think the representations and stereotypes have a connection to the everyday decisions people will make about me: whether or not to engage in conversation with me to important things such as whether or not they will offer me a job. It's already been shown in sociological studies that a name that "sounds" black can be the basis of a systematic categorical dismissal of black job applicants. It's also been shown that faculty members described with stereotypically "woman" adjectives such as "nurturing", "kind", and "agreeable" got less faculty positions.

So we can make micro-decisions based on names and overly-simplified adjectives that conjure up stereotypes of identities. And they can affect not only my life, but a lot of people who fit into categories that are not at the top of the hierarchy.

Mistrust of Police and Ending Violence in One LA Community

(Cross-posted from my other site.)

Lot of thought-out ideas to ending violence in one LA community. The ideas came complete with definitive metaphors and punchlines about problems and solutions.

I noted a few of the comments that struck me.

One major theme of the meeting was a distrust of the police.

  • Perception of the Police: They viewed the police as employing strategies of suppression rather than intervention.
  • No personal connection with the police: One community member, a female, said that "there's no cop I know that I can call at 2 AM"
  • Another Perception: Police are just a "mop and broom." One community member said that the police Are a "Mop and Broom". "Mop and broom" is an interesting metaphor for law enforcement. The implied association of mop and broom is that of janitors who only come after a "mess" has been made. The suggestion is an indictment of their preventative measures (or lack thereof) to deter crime.
  • History of mistrust between community and police? In the past, when activists did work with the police, the police arrested people, and so people that are actually prone to violence are going to stay as far away as possible.
  • Misattribution of credit for the drop in crime. Community members from a youth group disliked how the various police departments in LA County took credit for the low numbers and drop in crime. They said that it was community work, the work of outreach, gang interventionists, and street workers that curbed crime. They gave these interventionists the title of "knowledge workers", championing the rationality, agency, and influence of these mostly-youth-aged individuals.
  • One way the police could help the community from one perspective: share their resources with youth. They're largely viewed as having too many resources at their disposal, especially in comparison with economic development and education.

They also talked about life in the neighborhood and criticized churches and the foster system:

  • Kids get robbed at gunpoint everyday. Can't imagine what psychological toll that takes.
  • Going to funerals is normal. Again can't imagine what psychological toll that takes.
  • One community member talked about having a large number of people who suffer from PTSD
  • The Foster system was viewed as something that "attacked" black families and lacked discipline in its approach.
  • Churches have been an important uniter of community. It's one place that I know police officers in the LAPD have outreached to as a way to say they outreached to the community. However, in this meeting, one community member said that the church never did anything liberating to outreach to her.
  • "It's all a slam" said a community member. Slam of the jail bars to the slam of the casket.

My own thoughts:

  • As an Anthropologist interested in Victor Turner's work on symbolism and rituals, I'd been thinking about how quickly people act on symbols in gang life; wear the wrong color, be from the wrong crew, you're likely to get shot, even if your identity might be mistaken.
  • They talked a lot about changing the mindsets and cultures of gang members who perpetuated a majority of the violence. "Cultures" is always a buzzword for this Anthropologist, and I think we can participate in culture change. As far as carrying out change in the community, it can be sort of presumptuous of me, this coddled, comfortable, paraprofessional grad student. However, I have had the benefit of looking at tons of patterns throughout many disciplines and I can offer some synthesis of ideas from my experiences. That said, I've seen a lot of movements for change build momentum and lose it. I think part of it has to do with a feeling of "ownership" of a movement. Ownership is deeply personal, a "braiding" of the movement/cause with one's identity. You live, eat, breathe something. Who is going to step up, and make it their "own?" I think people rarely take on a full "ownership" and are prone to consumption. They'll support going to a few things, sign postcards, talking about it, but they won't do the logistics of phone banking, organizing rallies, getting permits, etc. I was just wondering how we facilitate an advantage to taking care of such logistics that are important for a movement without making it a paying job.

Math and Science Education and Inspiration

So Paulo Freire, champion of liberating education was brought back into my consciousness on this New Years Day.

He was brought to my attention via the mega Anthro Listserv.

Freire is the man who wrote Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Pedagogy of the Oppressed was something I'd never read in its entirety and read within the contexts of Education classes. I thought its ideas essential models to inspiring a thirst for learning and freedom in students.

The Listserv posting wasn't about Freire himself, but about how a tenured professor of physics named Denis Rancourt took Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed and applied it to his own class. One of the manifestations of the Freire's ideas is to place minimal importance on grades. One way Rancourt dealt with that? He gave all his students A+s. Why? He explains on his website:
With grades students learn to guess the professor's mind and to obey. It is a very sophisticated machinery, whereby the natural desire to learn, the intrinsic motivation to want to learn something because you are interested in the thing itself, is destroyed. Grades are the carrot and stick that shape obedient employees and that prepare students for the higher level indoctrinations of graduate and professional schools. The only way to develop independent thinking in the classroom is to give freedom, to break the power relationship by removing the instrument of power.
The fact that he gave everyone A+s pissed people off and led to his firing.

Why do I bring this up?

Well, the fact that a Physics professor in the "hardest" of sciences hit home with me. I'd experienced the sciences and math in a very negative way throughout my educational experience, and it all had to due with grades, or my sudden inability after high school to get good ones in those subjects.

Throughout undergrad, I more or less avoided sciences and math outside my requirements. I instead took Science as Culture and ended up taking a plethora of History of Science classes, eventually getting a Minor in it.

I've become interested in all kinds of ideas from philosophy to math, all of which I believe dovetails beautifully into the broadness of Anthropology, however, I find myself a bit behind and struggling mightily to pick up where my high school math and science abilities left off, now almost 9 years ago.

Needless to say I wish there were more Denis Rancourts so I could just focus on understanding permutations, probabilities, and/or calculus... as their very own language and symbol systems.